Posts Feed
Comments Feed

Shame Should Be a Badge of Honor

In a previous article, I mentioned the interesting confession of an educator friend who has years of experience in teaching, and only at the best schools.

“Usually,” my friend had lamented with a big sigh, “a small child arrives for his first day of school with an excellent self-image.”

“Great - so what’s the problem, then?” I asked.

“Well, very often, that’s the end of the story!”

The following incident, which I read of recently, may be an extreme example, but it surely represents the type of thing my friend had in mind.

A certain teacher asked her pupils to open the homework they were supposed to have prepared the previous evening. She noticed that little Suzie failed to open her book, and asked her why.

Suzie turned red and managed to stammer: “I…didn’t …do the homework. I…I…forgot about it.”

Thereupon, the teacher took a small coin out of her pocket, glared at the object of her anger and snickered: “Suzie, do you see this penny? Well, Suzie, I can tell you, you’re worth less than this little coin!”

I don’t know what our teacher had hoped to achieve, except perhaps to imbue in the poor girl a hatred of learning for the rest of her school career. The only thing we can be certain of, is that it’s past time that this lady looked for a new profession.

If what she had intended was to instill in her pupil a sense of shame, that’s a kind of shame that’s clearly very, very destructive. But it must be said, and said very clearly, there’s another kind of shame that’s very, very constructive.

And it’s nothing less than a tragedy that in today’s so-called civilized society, we’ve all but lost that sense of constructive shame. And as a society, we’re destined to pay very heavily for it.

I was inspired to write these words by an article by Dr. Joyce Brothers in Parade Magazine of Feb. 27, entitled “Shame May Not Be So Bad After All.” Indeed!

A world in which a woman boasts openly on a TV talk show about seducing her sister’s husband, in which a man on a reality show brazenly describes his plan to humiliate an unsuspecting teammate - “knife him in the back” - a world in which songs about the joys of beating up women are openly aired and new computer games where the mission is to kill John F. Kennedy are openly sold on the market - is this a healthy world or a very, very sick one?

Carrying around the “baggage” of shame only makes people bad about themselves, say some pseudo-psychologists. Dr. Brother correctly points out that rather than increasing our self-esteem, the suppression of shame can do just the opposite.

“Positive shame,” she asserts, “occurs when we see ourselves as we really are - perhaps too involved to notice that our spouse needs our help, perhaps too scared of what others think to stand up for someone in trouble, perhaps too resentful of the past to allow a wound to heal…”

Negative, destructive shame is something we can all do without.

But bringing back the positive shame of years and generations gone by is a prerequisite if we are to save this world.

Azriel Winnett is creator of Hodu.com - Your Communication Skills Portal. This popular free website helps you improve your communication and relationship skills in your business or professional life, in the family unit and on the social scene. New articles added almost daily. Visit Azriel’s blog at: http://hodu.com/blog.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

No Comments »

The Hidden Danger of the So-Called “Right to Die”

In October of 2003, the case of 39-year-old Terri Schiavo once again brought into focus the debate over the so-called “right to die.” The Florida woman was temporarily removed from her feeding tube (via a court order received by husband), but was put back on it a few days later when the Florida legislature authorized Governor Jeb Bush to issue a stay. As of this writing, her fate is still being debated in the courts and her case might now be headed for the U.S. Supreme Court. But I wonder if the right to die is something we really want? I always shudder a bit when politicians start talking about giving me more rights. Rights have a funny way of morphing into obligations.

In the state where I live, you can legally make a right turn at a red light if there is no sign stating that you can’t. This right is supposedly optional. However, if you’ve sitting at a red light with your turn signal on and five vehicles behind you with horns honking, it doesn’t seem quite so optional. I fear this will be the case with the right to die if it ever becomes law.

Some people just don’t have strong wills and I’m one of them. Many times in my life, someone with a stronger will has coaxed me into doing something I really didn’t want to do. I could never serve on a jury because I wouldn’t be able to maintain my independence. I would just go along to get along, even it meant not expressing what I honestly felt.

Recently, there was a study released which found that many of the people who signed up for the federal do-not-call list regularly bought stuff from telemarketers. The conclusion reached by thy group that did the study was that these people lied when they said they did not want to be called. I see it differently. I think they honestly do not wish to be called by telemarketers. Why then have they been buying from telemarketers? Because they don’t have very strong wills and telemarketers pressure them into buying stuff they do not really want. That’s why they have registered for the do-not-call list.

I believe a similar thing would happen with the right to die.
Many people will say they don’t ever want to be kept alive artificially because that’s the fashionable thing to say and they know that’s what other people want to hear. However, deep down, some of them would like for all means possible to be used to keep them alive. Saying you want to be kept alive artificially is not a popular thing to say. Most people will criticize you for it. Even people who have enough courage to actually say this will often back down when the pressure begins to mount. People will scold them with statements like “you shouldn’t be so selfish”, “why do you want to be such a burden to your relatives and friends?”, or “you’re old, you should be willing to die and make room for the younger people.”

When someone is on life support and is subsequently found to be brain dead, they can be taken off life support without the permission of their family in many states. Even with that being the case, most doctors will still euphemistically tell the family they need to make a “choice.” Of course, in the case of brain death, there is no real choice, since it’s totally different from euthanasia or cutting off life support from someone who is still alive. I wonder, though, if we would have any real choice if we actually got our “right to die.”

Terry Mitchell is a software engineer, freelance writer, and trivia buff from Hopewell, VA. He also serves as a political columnist for American Daily and operates his own website - http://www.commenterry.com - on which he posts commentaries on various subjects such as politics, technology, religion, health and well-being, personal finance, and sports. His commentaries offer a unique point of view that is not often found in mainstream media.

Tags: , , , , , ,

No Comments »

Lying Yes or No

What about little white lies? What about when your partner asks you if this dress makes her look fat. What do you think? Is it OK to lie to a person we care about for a kind reason, like to make him feel better and more secure, or to avoid a fight. As long as our heart is in the right place, even experts say that honesty isn’t always required. You don’t have to tell the whole truth if it will hurt your partner or if it’s something he can’t change. “

At the same time, not all lies are harmless — even little white ones — and some untruths can tear apart a relationship by damaging intimacy and trust. The worst kinds of lies result from trying to change who we really are or to minimize a serious problem in a relationship.

Following are some lies that can hurt your relationship.

“You deserved that promotion.”

Your significant other is upset because he has just been passed over for a raise — again. You’re trying to cheer him up. This is not a good lie because chances are that your partner wants your emotional support rather than your opinion of his job skills and performance. When you focus on his not getting the promotion instead of his feelings, you are saying that can’t stand to see him down or deal with him being depressed. The better answer would be something like “I’m sorry. I know how bad you must feel.”

“You think I was flirting with Stan! Don’t be silly!”

Stan a good-looking colleague with whom you regularly do flirt. Your partner happened to catch one of these interactions — and didn’t like what he saw. You actually do flirt with Bob, but you know your exchanges don’t mean anything, so they’re not worth discussing. Still, if your partner brought this up, he must be feeling jealous or insecure. By minimizing feelings, you are distancing yourself and damaging the relationship. It’s better to say that you sometimes do flirt with Stan but it doesn’t mean anything because you have no intention of getting involved with him.

Lying about sexual satisfaction is not a good idea because your love life will never improve if your partner doesn’t know he or she isn’t satisfying you. It’s better to say something like “Honey, can we try this another way?”

“I love spending Christmas with your family.”

You were hoping that the two of you could have an intimate holiday together, for once, but your partner just told you that he already committed to having the two of you spend it with his family. Your thinking is that you will hate this but it’s done now so why fight about it? The problem is that holidays will come up every year, and if you don’t say something about it you’ll be annoyed every year. It’s better to say something like “I’ll try to have a good time, but next year, let’s talk about our holiday plans together before committing.”

“Nothing’s wrong.”

You’re in a rotten mood, but it’s not about your partner and don’t feel like going into it until you have sorted out the details.

This kind of lie can turn something small into a great big deal because your mate will wonder what is so wrong that you can’t share it with him. It’s better to say “I’m upset, but it has nothing to do with you — and I don’t feel like talking about it right now.”

“Thanks for the surprise! I love these earrings!”

He was in a store, they caught his eye, and he had them wrapped up to go. The earrings aren’t really your style, but you appreciate his thoughtfulness, and being critical about those earrings may stop him from trying to do spontaneous things to please you. It’s probably better to tell the truth about your taste if you suspect that he spent a lot of money for them.

“You’re the best lover I’ve ever had.”

You’re next to him, sweaty, panting and post-orgasmic.

Sure, you’re exaggerating a bit, but you’re feeling euphoric.

This lie won’t hurt because it’s a compliment that will make him feel good.

“Susan says hello.”

Your friend hates your mate, who wants to know who you’ve been speaking with on the phone. You don’t want to hurt his feelings, and so this is a good lie because it’s kinder than the truth.

Note that Legal Helper Corp. - http://www.legalhelpmate.com/prenuptial-agreement.aspx - provides an easy-to-use, quick, and economical online method for creating Prenuptial Agreement (Premarital).

About The Author

Jeffrey Broobin is a free-lance writer on family and finance issues; his main goal is to help people during their complicated period of life.

Website: http://www.legalhelpmate.com

Email: jeffreyb@legalhelpmate.com

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

No Comments »

Next »

Close
E-mail It