Posts Feed
Comments Feed

The Awful Truth About Television TV Corrodes Community and Democracy

Americans are watching more TV and doing less in their communities

Americans watch TV 4.5 hours per day on average. TV takes up so much time that citizens are becoming less active socially and politically. They also trust the government and each other less and less. Researcher Dr. Robert Putnam in a study found that the more TV people watched, the less they were involved in public activities.

“TV viewing is strongly and negatively related to social trust and group membership,” the study found. Newspaper reading, on the other hand, had a strong positive relationship. Newspaper readers were involved in larger numbers of political organizations. The study controlled for education, income, age, race, place of residence, work status, and gender.

The study also found that “heavy TV watching is one important reason why less educated people are less engaged in the life of their communities.”

TV: How the few can control the many

Television, because of the expense involved in production and distribution, inherently favors large corporations. Usually, the only other social entity able to afford the expense of TV is government.

It is inherently a one-to-many technology. The networks transmit one message over the airwaves or through the cable network to thousands or millions or, in the case of events like the Super Bowl and the Olympics, billions of minds. This is different from the internet where many people can interact and discuss as a group.

Furthermore, because of the tendency of the television set to shut down people’s ability to think critically, as discussed in the “TV’s hypnotic effect” article, the message that is blasted out over the airwaves enters viewers’ minds unfiltered. Whether you agree with the message or not, that is simply too much power.

Five companies control the media

Looking at the amount of programming available, one might think that there is a wide variety of choice. There are literally hundreds of TV stations with options to choose from sports to news to cartoons to history to painting and more. The amount of options is staggering. However, only five major corporations control the majority of the media. Those companies get access to nearly every American for 4

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

No Comments »

Why Are They Smiling

Look at those teeth, all straight and unnaturally bright white. They never fail to flash down from billboards and thirty-second promos on TV. The four people on a news team may vary ethnically, by gender, and education, but they all have great white smiles. “You rise and we’ll shine” boasts one team from a downtown billboard. And they are always smiling.

Why are they smiling? Okay, forget the sports presenter, because sports is about games anyway. Then again, the sports people seem to be most grave when on the air. This could be significant.

But what about the other folks, the co-anchors and weather person? Sure, they get paid well, but look at what they do for a livingthey give us bad news. For example:

“Hi, I’m Perky Bubbles and this is the 6 o’clock news. Thousands died in a catastrophic earthquake in Pakistan. Raging fires consumed 10,000 acres of suburban Los Angeles. Local mother drowns two kids in bathtub, then jumps out tenth floor window. All coming up, next!” And she says it with those pearly whites glaring at us.

Then the stories come.

“Reporting on the Pakistani tragedy is Iam Heere,” says Perky.

“Thanks, Perky,” says a somber-looking male reporter in 1988 Army surplus attire. He rambles on for two minutes, then wraps up with “…and this has been made that much worse by the staggering poverty of just about everyone in this part of the country. Perky?”

A brief look of concern from Perky as she says “Thanks, Iam.” Then a big smile and “We’ll be back after these messages.”

Switch to commercial for (cough) Lexus–the cost of just one Lexus would equal the combined total annual income of at least three of those devastated Pakistani villages. Then back to Perky and the others, and we hear about murders, political corruption, a devastating hurricane (with “humorous” footage of a trailer blowing end-over-end in one shot that is rerun three times), and steroid use in a baseball team.

So I ask again… WHY are they smiling? Switching to another channel:

Rocky (smiling): “Well, Dusty, how about those suicide bombers, huh?”

Dusty (smiling): “Right, Rocky, and reports indicate that casualties included several innocent bystanders.”

Rocky (smiling): “Pentagon sources say that added precautions will now be added to future pro-Saddam demonstrations. Dusty?”

Dusty: (smiling): Thanks Rocky. Coming up next: the number of homeless goes up 12 percent last month; Big Bird stricken with avian flu; and president warns that thousands may die in winter cold as fuel prices skyrocket.” (Really big smile.) “All coming after these words!”

Okay, for anyone over forty, news is now officially entertainment. The “I’m mad as hell, and I’m not going to take it anymore” folks are dim images in history. News is no longer about keeping us informed, but about keeping us entertained. As William Paley, founder of CBS, put it decades ago, the job of radio (and television) is to keep the audience listening between commercials. When the book-turned-movie “Network” made its rounds some twenty years ago, We The People were supposed to be shocked by the fictitious “Mao Tse Tung Terrorist Hour,” on which actual acts of violence would be scheduled to meet TV demands. The story’s audiences loved the new show, and ratings soared.

What does the real world offer us now? To start, we have all those cop and home video shows that allow us to vicariously participate in real chases, arrests, gunfights, and the odd killing or two. That led to (ahem) “reality TV,” in which people were subjected to a variety of cruel punishments for the home-viewing thrill of us all. And the ratings soared!

How could the once staid and responsible news media compete with all that “reality?” Pain, death, explosions, and other mayhem were no longer the sole domain of the newsroom. Now anybody could show it as part of family entertainment.

Have we, as a society, become so brainwashed into accepting violence and the darkest episodes of human beings that we see it all as simple entertainment? Is television giving us an endorphin high by showing us unspeakable violence? (In Saudi Arabia, remember, beheadings are greatly attended public events, but they are not televised.) Is this making us less sensitive to the needs of our fellow creatures, human and otherwise? If so, what does that make us? Okay, now, back to the news, already in progress:

Top of the hour, Rocky (smiling): “Record tsunami totally devastates San Francisco and San Diego. Gang of little girls on robbery spree of designer t-shirt shops in Cleveland malls. Dusty?”

Dusty (really big smile): “Scientists discover moon-sized meteor heading towards Earth; the world will end in ten days.” (Looks up, smiling): “All this and more in just a minute.”

This is followed by a commercial for the biggest Ford clearance sale in history. The tag line ends: “Everything must go! Offer ends in ten days!”

Dr. Sprackland can be reached at robertsprackland@comcast.net.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

No Comments »

Why are We Addicted to Criminal Trials

It’s a horrible thing when a criminal case comes to our attention. First we are appalled, then curious and then addicted. Take the Scott Peterson trial for example. The press jumped on this case because it happened in Modesto, CA where Rep. Gary Condit lives. They hoped he was somehow involved and could connect this case to that of Chandra Levy. They were wrong. However, the vast news coverage would have subsided on the Peterson case if we, the public, had not wanted to know. There are dozens of husbands accused of killing their wives each year in this country, but few have garnished the notoriety this trial has.

Other kinds of trials grab our attention too, such as the man with nine wives, a judge on trial for bribery, the Tri-State Crematory case, a teen accused of killing his grandparents, the Seattle Spammer trial, serial killers, hired hits and many more from coast to coast. Perhaps the most intriguing are trials where the accused is acquitted. The Jerry Dean case is a prime example. Jerry Dean was accused of killing a woman who filed a sexual harassment charge against him, but the jury found him not guilty and the case remains unsolved. Another intriguing case is the “Deer Hunters Trial” involving the Duvall brothers. Even after the criminal trial was over, civil cases, such as the wife of the victim suing the wife of the defendant, kept us glued.

Why are we so addicted? Some think it’s because we just can’t believe people are truly evil enough to commit such crimes. Others think it’s because we all have a streak of evil and wonder where the line is - that line most of us know not to cross. We wonder what snaps, what mental process occurs that allows one person to kill another. As well, some of us are looking for the perfect crime, the one prosecutors just can’t prove beyond a shadow of a doubt, even though we know the defendant is guilt. Sadly, some of us are addicted because a trial is in our area and touches us personally.

Whatever the reason, we are addicted and there is no known cure.

About The Author

Marti Talbott is the author of: “Colorado Cold Case - the Botham/Miracle Murders” and the owner of Case Watchers, a criminal trial news site.

http://www.casewatchers.com/

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

No Comments »

Close
E-mail It